In action to determine whether the utility or developer must bear costs of relocating utilities to accommodate construction of streets within city limits, district court judgment is affirmed where the court did not err in concluding plaintiff must bear the costs, as development is a private commercial development involving no city actors, and the city’s conditions to a permit application’s approval does not convert a private development into public works project.
Read Whisenhunt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, No. 08-3542
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.Submitted: April 16, 2009Filed: July 17, 2009
JudgesBefore WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.Opinion by WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
