In plaintiffs’ medical malpractice suit against their deceased son’s doctor and his clinic, district court’s dismissal and rejection of their Rule 59(e) motion and a motion for leave to file a new set of supplemental reports is reversed and remanded as the district court erred in concluding that whatever flaws existed in the expert reports that the plaintiffs submitted went to their admissibility, as opposed to their weight.
Read Walsh v. Chez, No. 08-1006
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division
Argued December 12, 2008Decided October 21, 2009
Judges
Before: Cudahy, Flaum, and Wood, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Wood, Circuit Judge
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
