In a First Amendment challenge to an ordinance that regulated the operation of sexually oriented businesses, a preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiffs is vacated where the ordinance was sufficiently clear to provide plaintiff-store with notice that the proposed inventory in its zoning application qualified it as a sexually oriented business.
Read VIP of Berlin v. Middlebrooks, No. 09-2950
Appellate Information
Argued: September 15, 2009
Decided: January 25, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Straub
Counsel
For Appellants:
Thomas R. Gerarde and Katherine E. Rule, Howd & Ludorf, LLC, Hartford, CT
For Appellee:
Jennifer M. Kinsley, Sirkin Pinales & Schwartz LLP, Cincinnati, OH
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
