District court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress and motion to dismiss his indictment charging him with failure to register as a sex offender after traveling interstate commerce is affirmed where: 1) defendant’s constitutional challenge to the federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) is rejected; 2) defendant lacks standing to raise a Tenth Amendment challenge to SORNA because he is a private party; 3) SORNA applies to defendant who traveled interstate after enactment of the Act but before the Attorney General issued the interim rule on the application of the Act.
Read US v. Zuniga, No. 08-3156
Appellate Information
Submitted: May 11, 2009
Filed: September 1, 2009
Judges
Per Curiam Opinion
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
