Defendant’s drug sentence is affirmed where the district court lacked authority to sentence him to less than the minimum of the amended guideline range because the Sentencing Commission’s policy statements neither take away from its ability to define and limit its own policy statements under 18 U.S.C. section 994, nor undercut the binding effect of U.S.S.G. section 1B1.10.

Read US v. Williams, No. 08-1284

Appellate Information

Filed August 4, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge McKay

Counsel

For Appellant:

David E. Johnson, Denver, CO

For Appellee:

Andrew A. Vogt, Assistant United States Attorney, Denver, CO

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules