Conviction of defendant for possession and intent to distribute cocaine and sentenced to 70 months’ imprisonment is affirmed as the incriminating statements defendant gave to the police after his arrest was voluntary because defendant’s choice to reveal the cocaine in his safe was rationally made within the context of the negotiations and not the result of false promises made by the police.
Read US v, Villalpando, No. 09-1263
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Decided December 16, 2009
Judges
Before: Flaum, Wood, and Tinder, Circuit Judges
Opinion by TInder, Circuit Judge
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
