Defendant’s drug and firearm possession convictions and sentence are affirmed where: 1) absent a display of a weapon or some other type of show of authority, defendant voluntarily consented to further questioning by the officer who stopped her vehicle; 2) sufficient evidence supported defendant’s conviction for possessing a firearm in furtherance of her methamphetamine trafficking; and 3) the most natural reading of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c) was that its prefatory clause referred only to a minimum sentence provided by section 924(c) or any other statutory provision that proscribed the conduct set forth in section 924(c).
Read US v. Villa, No. 08-8100
Appellate Information
Filed December 29, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Tacha
Counsel
For Appellant:
Ronald G. Pretty, Cheyenne, WY
For Appellee:
David A. Kubichek and Kelly H. Rankin, Office of the United States Attorney for the District of Wyoming, Casper, WY
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
