In a drug and firearm prosecution, a denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment under the Speedy Trial Act is affirmed in part where defendant’s defense was not hindered by the delays that occurred. However, the ruling is reversed in part where the district court failed to make a record upon which adequate findings could be based with respect to defendant’s Speedy Trial Act claim.
Read US v. Toombs, No. 08-3278
Appellate Information
Filed August 3, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Murphy
Counsel
For Appellant:
Melanie Morgan, Morgan Pilate LLC, Olathe, KS
For Appellee:
Terra D. Morehead, Assistant United States Attorney, Kansas City, KS
Marietta Parker, Acting United States Attorney, Kansas City, KS
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
