Sentence for wire fraud is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in denying defendant’s request for an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction as his comments showed he expressly and unequivocally denied his factual guilt; and 2) the court followed proper procedure and applied the relevant factors in determining whether the sentence in this case should be consecutive to two other sentences, and its decision to impose a consecutive sentence was reasonable.
Read US v. Tonks, No. 08-3821
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.Submitted: June 12, 2009Filed: July 29, 2009
JudgesBefore MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.Opinion by SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
