In a conviction of defendant for transporting child pornography, district court’s imposition of two guideline enhancements for use of a computer and distribution of material that involved the sexual exploitation of a minor is affirmed as, the district court did not engage in “double counting” as the enhancement for distributing material that involved the sexual exploitation of a minor was not based on the same factual predicate as the offense of transporting child pornography under section 2252A(a)(1) to which defendant pleaded guilty.
Read US v. Tenuto, No. 09-2075
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division
Decided February 3, 2010
Judges
Before: Williams, Manion, and Cudahy, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Circuit Judge Manion
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
