District court order revoking defendant’s release and sentencing him to serve the remainder of his supervised-release term in prison is affirmed where the court did not err in finding defendant had violated the terms of his supervised release, as the evidence was sufficient to show he had violated the conditions of his release by having a minor in his residence.
Read US v. Smith, No. 08-3157
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.Submitted: June 9, 2009Filed: August 5, 2009
JudgesBefore SMITH and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges, and LIMBAUGH, District Judge.Opinion by LIMBAUGH, District Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
