Defendant’s child pornography sentence is vacated in part, where a condition of defendant’s supervised release stating that he could not access via computer any material that related to minors was overly broad, imposing a far greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary to achieve the legitimate goals of supervised release.
Read US v. Riley, No. 08-50009
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted March 12, 2009
Filed August 13, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Berzon
Counsel
For Appellant:
Kurt Mayer, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA
For Appellee:
Anne C. Gannon, Assistant United States Attorney, Santa Ana, CA
Thomas P. O’Brien, United States Attorney, Santa Ana, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
