Defendants’ drug convictions and sentences are affirmed where: 1) the government’s application to wiretap defendants’ calls satisfied the necessity requirement; 2) the district court did not err in finding that the government had not intercepted telephone calls on a line for which there was no court order; 3) the government was not required to seal call data content and it timely sealed the wiretap recordings; and 4) the government did not violate the statutory wiretap monitoring requirements of 18 U.S.C. section 2518(5).
Read US v. Reed, No. 06-50040
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted October 24, 2008
Filed August 4, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Smith
Counsel
For Appellant:
Robinson D. Harley, Jr., Santa Ana, California
For Appellee:
Shannon P. Ryan, Assistant United States Attorney for the Central District of California, Los Angeles, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
