District court’s imposition of an enhancement under U.S.S.G. section 2G2.2(b)(3)(B) on a defendant convicted of transportation and possession of child pornography is affirmed where, although defendant did not have an explicit agreement or precise bargain with the woman, the content of his conversations lead to the conclusion that he reasonably anticipated or believed that his exchange of child pornography would result in a sexual encounter with the woman and her children.
Read US v. Owens, No. 09-1279
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Bend Division
Decided November 6, 2009
Judges
Before: Ripple, Kanne, and Sykes, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Kanne, Circuit Judge
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
