In a child pornography prosecution, denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss the charges is affirmed where the crime of receiving child pornography codified at 18 U.S.C. section 2252A(a)(2)(A) does not include intent to distribute among its elements.
Read US v. Olander, No. 08-30180
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted May 5, 2009
Filed July 15, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Fletcher
Counsel
For Appellant:
Amy Baggio, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR
For Appellee:
Greg Nylus, Office of the United States Attorney, Portland, OR
Michelle Holman Kerin, Office of the United States Attorney, Portland, OR
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
