Defendant’s supervised release revocation sentence is affirmed where the commission’s policy statement concerning whether a sentence reduction was authorized, U.S.S.G. section 1B1.10, was binding, and did not authorize a reduction in defendant’s supervised release revocation sentence.
Read US v. Morales, No. 09-30047
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted November 4, 2009
Filed January 5, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Kozinski
Counsel
For Appellant:
Stephen R. Sady, Alison M. Clark, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Portland, OR
For Appellee:
Leah K. Bolstad, Karin J. Immergut and Kathleen L. Bickers, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, OR
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
