Conviction for bank robbery and using a firearm during a robbery is affirmed where there was sufficient evidence to convict the defendant on both counts as the the jury could rationally connect defendant’s presence in the house to the description of Robber #2, and defendant’s work in the bank vault aided and abetted the use of the firearm in the robbery.
Read US v. Moore, No. 07-3978
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division.Argued November 4, 2008Decided July 9, 2009
JudgesBefore POSNER, WOOD, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.Opinion by TINDER, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
