In a dispute involving enforcement of the Clean Water Act, district court’s judgment against defendant is affirmed where: 1) the court did not err in finding defendant did not have standing to intervene in an action to enforce the Clean Water Act against the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District as defendant did not adequately allege that it would suffer a concrete and particularized injury, nor did it establish that its injury was fairly traceable to the challenged action and would likely to be redressed by a favorable decision; and 2) defendant did not have the right to intervene under either Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(1) or 24(a)(2).
Read US v. Missouri Industrial Energy Consumers, No. 08-3404
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriSubmitted: May 14, 2009Filed: June 22, 2009
JudgesBefore WOLLMAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.Opinion by MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
