District court’s conviction of defendant pursuant to his unconditional guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a felon is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in holding that a potential change in Fourth Amendment law posed by Gant did not constitute a fair and just reason for permitting defendant to withdraw his guilty plea; and 2) defendant’s sentence was based on reliable information and was substantively reasonable.
Read US v. Mays, No. 09-1767
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Decided January 27, 2010
Judges
Before: Manion, Sykes and Tinder, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Circuit Judge Manion
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules