District court’s decision denying defendant’s motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2) is remanded as the court’s written analysis on the order form with a single sentence of explanation is a bit too terse to allow meaningful review of its decision, and here, the problem arises from the fact that it is impossible to ensure that the district court did not abuse its discretion if the order shows only that the district court exercised its discretion rather than showing how its exercised that discretion.
Read US v. Marion, No. 09-2525
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division
Decided December 29, 2009
Judges
Before: Rovner, Posner and Kanne, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Kanne, Circuit Judge
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
