Defendant’s sentence for interstate harassment is affirmed where the district court’s inherently factual determination that defendant induced a co-conspirator’s restraint of the victim was not illogical, implausible, or without support in the record, and thus the district court properly applied a “restraint of the victim” enhancement.
Read US v. Loew, No. 09-30032
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted December 7, 2009
Filed February 2, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Tallman
Counsel
For Appellant:
Greg S. Silvey, Silvey Law Office, Kuna, ID
For Appellee:
Richard A. Friedman, Gary G. Grindler and Lanny A. Breuer, United States Attorney’s Office, Boise, ID
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
