A conviction for conspiracy to distribute illegal drugs is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars; and 2) defendant’s Brady claim is rejected where, despite the government’s failure to disclose certain impeachment evidence, defendant in fact effectively cross-examined the witnesses at issue about inconsistencies between what they had said to police and what they testified to.
Read US v. Livingstone, No. 08-3418
Appellate Information
Submitted: June 9, 2009
Filed: August 18, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Arnold
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
