The district court’s restitution order imposed upon defendants for conspiracy to violate civil rights relating to a prostitution scheme is vacated where restitution for “lost income” under 18 U.S.C. section 3663 was not the same as disgorgement of all of defendants’ ill-gotten gains from the victims’ forced prostitution.
Read US v. Kuo, No. 08-10314
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted October 15, 2009
Filed December 3, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Graber
Counsel
For Appellant:
Peter C. Wolff, Jr. and Pamela E. Tamashiro, Honolulu, HI
For Appellee:
Karen L. Stevens, United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
