Conviction for production and possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant intentionally waived his right to challenge the constitutionality of the indictment against him as he was aware that he could challenge the constitutionality of the indictment on Commerce Clause grounds and made a conscious decision not to press the argument in district court proceedings; and 2) the indictment was not defective and its wording did not deprive defendant of the opportunity to prepare an adequate defense.
Read US v. Kincaid, No. 08-1953Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois.Argued: January 7, 2009Decided: July 2, 2009
JudgesBefore POSNER, RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.Opinion by RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
