Defendant’s child pornography conviction is affirmed where: 1) the evidence was sufficient for the district court to reasonably find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that defendant knowingly possessed the images of child pornography found on his computer; 2) the evidence was more than sufficient to support the district court’s finding that the images depicted real minors; and 3) the district court reasonably found that one or more of the twenty-seven images depicted sexually explicit conduct, and that defendant knew that fact based on his knowing possession of the images and his admissions when arrested.
Read US v. Kain, No. 08-3396
Appellate Information
Submitted: September 25, 2009
Filed: December 22, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Loken
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
