Sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where there was no clerical error in defendant’s sentence, as nothing in the record indicates that a relevant conduct finding involving the amount of crack cocaine was added to the overall sentencing calculation without the district court’s knowledge or approval and thus there is no jurisdiction to change the finding under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.
Read US v. Johnson, No. 08-3393
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.Argued April 2, 2009Decided July 9, 2009
JudgesBefore BAUER and FLAUM, Circuit Judges, and KAPALA, District JudgeOpinion by BAUER, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
