Conviction for armed bank robbery and brandishing a firearm is affirmed where the court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to suppress, as defendant’s mother had actual and apparent authority to consent to the search of his safe, and the government submitted sufficient evidence to conclude that defendant’s mother voluntarily consented to the search through her words and actions.
Read US v. James, No. 08-3327
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.Argued May 7, 2009Decided July 9, 2009
JudgesBefore FLAUM and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and LAWRENCE, District Judge. Opinion by FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
