Defendant’s assault conviction is affirmed in part where, although the prosecutors engaged in improper questioning during cross-examination and improper vouching during closing arguments, the court could not say the prosecutors’ misconduct affected the outcome of the district court proceedings. However, defendant’s conviction is reversed in part where the jury instruction on one count defined “force” out of the statute entirely by equating it with physical intimidation.
Read US v. Harrison, No. 08-10391
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted May 13, 2009
Filed August 19, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Kozinski
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Bybee
Counsel
For Appellant:
Peter C. Wolff, Jr., Office of the Federal Public Defender, Honolulu, HI
For Appellee:
Lawrence L. Tong, Assistant United States Attorney, Honolulu, HI
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
