Conviction for various crimes committed in furtherance of a typical Ponzi scheme is affirmed where: 1) the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions; and 2) the district court did not err in certain omissions in the instructions given to the jury in co-defendant Moore’s trial.
Read US v. Griggs, No. 06-4211
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division.Argued: February 9, 2008Decided: June 24, 2009
JudgesBefore POSNER and SYKES, Circuit Judges, and DOW, District Judge.Opinion by POSNER, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
