Defendant’s conviction for malicious interference with a military radio system is affirmed, where Defendant waived his right to counsel knowingly and intelligently, because the prosecutor did not err in including the potential sentencing enhancements in his calculation of the maximum possible penalty provided by law.
Read US v. Gerritsen, No. 06-50552
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted January 13, 2009
Filed July 10, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Ikuta
Counsel
For Appellant:
Elizabeth A. Newman, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA
For Appellee:
Daniel B. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
