Defendant’s tax fraud conviction is affirmed where the disqualification of defendant’s counsel did not violate his right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment because the district court reasonably assessed the problems that could arise from counsel’s continued representation of defendant.
Read US v. Evanson, No. 08-4164
Appellate Information
Filed October 19, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Hartz
Counsel
For Appellant:
Rodney R. Parker, Max D. Wheeler and Sam Harkness, Snow, Christensen & Martineau, Salt Lake City, UT
For Appellee:
Jennifer Levin Eichhorn, John A. DiCicco, Alan Hechtkopf, Karen Quesnel, Gregory Victor Davis, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
