Defendant’s drug conviction and sentence are affirmed, where 1) there was sufficient evidence to support defendant’s conviction for the narcotics conspiracy; 2) a confidential informant’s statements were not hearsay because they were not offered to establish the truth of the matter asserted; and 3) defendant’s sentence properly calculated his criminal history score.
Read US v. Deitz, No. 05-3410
Appellate Information
Argued: April 23, 2009
Decided and Filed: August 20, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Cole
Counsel
For Appellant:
Dennis C. Belli, Columbus, OH
For Appellee:
Joseph R. Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Toledo, OH
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
