Conviction for knowingly persuading, inducing, enticing, or coercing an individual under the age of 18 to engage in criminal sexual activity is affirmed where the government’s failure to disclose the identity behind two of the screen names did not violate Brady and entitle defendant to a new trial as the information was not material.
Read US v. Daniel, No. 08-2672
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division.Argued April 9, 2009Decided August 13, 2009
JudgesBefore MANION, ROVNER, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.Opinion by WOOD, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
