In a drug and firearm prosecution, the District Court’s order suppressing evidence obtained through a wiretap is reversed, where the government’s affidavit in support of its application for the wiretap set forth facts minimally adequate to support the finding that a wiretap was necessary to the government’s investigation.
Read US v. Concepcion, No. 08-3785
Appellate Information
Argued: June 3, 2009
Decided: August 31, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge McLaughlin
Counsel
For Appellant:
William J. Harrington, Assistant United States Attorney, for Lev L. Dassin, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY
For Appellee:
Darrell B. Fields, Federal Defenders of New York, New York, NY
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
