Defendant’s drug conviction is affirmed where: 1) the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to conclude that defendant provided cocaine for drug transactions; and 2) certain challenged statements by a prosecution witness were not hearsay because they did not depend on the witness’s truthfulness, memory, or perception.
Read US v. Cesareo-Ayala, No. 08-3201
Appellate Information
Filed August 12, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Hartz
Counsel
For Appellant:
Rick E. Bailey, Conlee, Schmidt & Emerson, L.L.P., Wichita, KS
For Appellee:
James A. Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, Topeka, KS
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
