Defendant’s conviction for knowingly possessing a firearm in and affecting commerce while being an unlawful user or addicted to a controlled substance is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to instruct the jury on defendant’s proposed definition of “unlawful user”; 2) the district court’s instruction made clear that the prosecutor was required to prove more than use of a controlled substance in a manner other than as prescribed by a licensed physician; and 3) reasonable jurors could have concluded from this evidence that defendant’s use of crack cocaine was regular, sustained, and contemporaneous with his possession of the five firearms at issue.
Read US v. Burchard, No. 07-6312
Appellate Information
Argued: December 3, 2008
Decided and Filed: September 2, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge White
Counsel
For Appellant:
Richard L. Walter, Boehl, Stopher & Graves, Paducah, KY
For Appellee:
G. David Sparks, Assistant United States Attorney, Paducah, KY
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
