Defendant’s embezzlement sentence is affirmed where: 1) defendant failed to show that the government had breached its plea agreement with him based on a witness’s comments that defendant had not accepted responsibility; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in varying upward from defendant’s Guidelines sentence.
Read US v. Bullcoming, No. 09-6010
Appellate Information
Filed September 3, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Hartz
Counsel
For Appellant:
Fred L. Staggs, Oklahoma City, OK
For Appellee:
Arvo Q. Mikkanen, Assistant United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, OK
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
