Defendant’s child pornography sentence is affirmed where, applying a “limited context” test that permits consideration of the context in which the pornographic photographs were taken but limits the consideration of contextual evidence to the circumstances directly related to the taking of the images, the court determines that certain photos at issue were “lascivious” under the Sentencing Guidelines.
Read US v. Brown, No. 07-4197
Appellate Information
Submitted: April 22, 2009
Decided and Filed: August 26, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Clay
Counsel
For Appellant:
Charles E. Fleming, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Cleveland, OH
For Appellee:
Daniel R. Ranke, Assistant United States Attorney, Cleveland, OH
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
