Defendant’s firearm possession conviction is affirmed where the district court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence because: 1) the use of handcuffs by the police was reasonable under the circumstances, coming as it did after the discovery of a controlled substance; 2) the search of defendant’s person was reasonable under the circumstances; and 3) the officers had good reason to detain defendant pending further investigation.
Read US v. Albert, No. 07-4193
Appellate Information
Filed September 1, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge O’Brien
Counsel
For Appellant:
Scott Keith Wilson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Salt Lake City, UT
For Appellee:
Stephen J. Sorenson, Assistant United States Attorney, Salt Lake City, UT
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
