In an action by an Indian tribe claiming that another tribe was fishing outside of its adjudicated grounds, summary judgment for plaintiff is reversed where an injunction issued earlier in the same case was properly interpreted to place the disputed fishing grounds in defendant’s territory.
Read Upper Skagit Tribe v. Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe, No. 07-35061
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted October 21, 2008
Filed August 6, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Kleinfeld
Counsel
For Appellant:
Michelle Hansen, Suquamish Tribe, Office of Tribal Attorney, Suquamish, WA
For Appellees:
Harold Chesnin, Office of the Tribal Attorney, Seattle, WA
Andrew H. Salter, Salter Joyce Ziker, PLLC, Seattle, WA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
