In an action involving insurers’ coverage obligations for certain insurance claims, judgment for plaintiffs is affirmed where the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting into evidence certain computer-generated summaries of payments made on insurance claims.
Read U-Haul Int’l., Inc. v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., No. 07-16187
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted January 15, 2009
Filed August 12, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Wallace
Counsel
For Appellants:
Michael C. Bruck, Williams Montgomery & John Ltd., Chicago, IL
Alyssa M. Campbell, Williams Montgomery & John Ltd., Chicago, IL
For Appellees:
Bruce M. Friedman, Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman LLP, New York, NY
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
