In a dispute involving a maritime attachment and garnishment against a corporate alter ego, district court order vacating the attachment is affirmed where, if a corporation is registered with the New York Department of State and therefore found within the district for the purposes of Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, that corporation’s alter egos are also found within the district and the property of those alter egos is not subject to maritime attachment.
Read Transfield ER Cape Ltd. v. Industrial Carriers Inc., No. 09-1733
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.Submitted: May 5, 2009Decided: July 8, 2009
JudgesBefore: FEINBERG, WINTER, and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.Opinion by CABRANES, Circuit Judge.
CounselFor Plaintiff: George Michael Chalos, Chalos & Co., P.C., Oyster Bay, NY.
For Defendant: Garth S. Wolfson, Mahoney & Keane, LLP, New York, NY.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
