When Justice Scalia died, just over six weeks ago, Senate Republicans immediately announced their opposition to an Obama-appointed replacement. They would withhold their advice and consent until after the Presidential elections, they maintained, even as the President nominated a well-liked, highly-qualified moderate like Merrick Garland.

But, Republican resolve might be weakening, and it’s becoming more likely that we’ll see a ninth justice before November.

Merrick Garland is a centrist candidate. He leans slightly right on criminal matters, slightly left on the environment, and remains entirely mainstream everywhere else. In a non-election, less-partisan year, he’s the kind of candidate who wouldn’t engender much strong opposition. But, of course, this isn’t such a year.

When Garland was first nominated, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called him up. McConnell’s message: congrats, but we’re not going to act on your nomination, so don’t bother coming around for perfunctory meetings.

Republicans Open Their Doors to Garland, Slowly

Just two weeks later, things are changing. We’ve already started to see some of the impacts of an imbalanced Supreme Court, including two deadlocked decisions. (And there’s probably more on the way.) That puts increasing pressure on Republican opposition.

Senator Kirk could be the first of many cracks in the Republican wall, at least if you believe reports from the White House. The Obama administration, which brought back some of its top election campaigners to put pressure on the Senate, says that it is slowly beating back Republican resistance.

Sixteen Republican senators, a quarter of the GOP caucus, now support meeting with Garland, according to NBC News. And most Americans support an immediate Congressional vote on Garland’s nomination. Grassley is even facing tough questions from his constituents back home.

Of course, a meeting does not an appointment make. And it’s unlikely that many voters will be swayed by the Senate nomination vote alone – meaning that Republican senators can likely withstand public pressure for a while.

But, it is progress. If you’re a gambler, you might want to start putting some money on Merrick.

Related Resources:

  • Can Merrick Garland Kill the Filibuster? (The New Yorker)
  • Merrick Garland’s 6 Most Important D.C. Cir. Opinions (FindLaw’s D.C. Circuit Blog)
  • SCOTUS Kicks Off Deadlock Season With First 4-4 Split (FindLaw’s U.S. Supreme Court Blog)
  • 8-Justice Court’s Impact Is Felt by Supreme Court Litigants (FindLaw’s U.S. Supreme Court Blog)

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules