In an action for tuition reimbursement under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), summary judgment for defendant department of education is affirmed where: 1) because the IDEA does not require that an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) name a specific school placement, plaintiff-child’s IEP was not procedurally deficient; and 2) there was substantial evidence in the record that the IEP provided significant benefits to plaintiff in addressing his problematic behaviors.
Read T.Y. v. N.Y. City Dep’t of Educ., No. 08-3527
Appellate Information
Argued: June 22, 2009
Decided: October 9, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Parker
Counsel
Appellants:
Gary S. Masterson and Tracy Spencer Walsh, Mayerson & Associates, New York, NY
For Appellee:
Suzanne K. Colt and Pamela Seider Dolgow, Assistant Corporation Counsel, New York, NY
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
