In a challenge to collection due process determinations issued by the IRS’s Office of Appeals regarding plaintiff’s tax obligations, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, because plaintiff failed to articulate any cognizable violation of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) in connection with the imposition of the failure-to-pay penalties, section 3512(a) of the PRA provided him with no protection from those penalties.
Read Springer v. Comm’r. of Int’l. Rev., No. 08-9004
Appellate Information
Filed August 31, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge McKay
Counsel
For Appellant:
Jerold Barringer, Nokomis, IL
For Appellee:
Nathan J. Hochman, Attorney, Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Michael J. Haungs, Attorney, Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
