District court’s grant of summary judgment on claim of violation of Minnesota lemon law and Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act violation is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff failed to present evidence that the engine stalls substantially impaired the use or market value as required by the lemon law, and the claim relating to transmission leaks was barred by statute; and 2) the breach of warranty claim was properly denied, as there was no dispute that an alleged breach of warranty relating to stalls or transmission fluid leaks caused any harm.
Read Sipe v. Workhorse Custom Chassis, LLC, No. 08-3230
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.Submitted: June 11, 2009Filed: July 16, 2009
JudgesBefore LOKEN, Chief Judge, JOHN R. GIBSON and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.Opinion by GRUENDER, Chief Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
