In an ERISA action seeking retroactive pension and savings benefits allegedly owed to plaintiff under two of defendants’ employee benefits plans, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where the plan administrator’s denial of plaintiff’s claim for benefits was not arbitrary or capricious because, inter alia, plaintiff was ineligible for benefits under the Plans as an independent contractor.
Read Scruggs v. ExxonMobil Pension Plan, No. 08-6145
Appellate Information
Filed November 9, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Ebel
Counsel
For Appellant:
Babette Patton, Breathwit & Patton, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK
For Appellees:
Michael S. Beaver and Catherine C. Crane, Holland & Hart LLP, Greenwood Village, CO
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
