In an appeal from the district court’s denial of appellant’s motion to intervene as of right in a securities fraud action, the order is affirmed where appellant was improperly attempting to enforce a restitution order in a parallel criminal action in a manner outside the scope of 18 U.S.C. section 3664(m)(1)(B).
Read Schultz v. US, No. 08-17304
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted December 11, 2009
Filed February 9, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Lynn
Counsel
For Appellant:
Richard M. Goldstein, Goldstein, Tanen & Trench, P.A., Miami, FL
For Appellee:
Evan Jason Smith, Esquire, Brodsky & smith, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
