In an action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for sending unsolicited text messages, summary judgment for Defendant is reversed, where a genuine issue of material fact existed concerning whether the equipment used by Defendant had the capacity to store or produce numbers to be called using a random or sequential number generator and to dial such numbers.
Read Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., No. 07-16356.
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Claudia Wilken, District Judge, PresidingArgued and Submitted February 11, 2009–San Francisco, CaliforniaFiled June 19, 2009
Judges
Before: John T. Noonan, David R. Thompson and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.Opinion by Judge N.R. Smith.
Counsel
John G. Jacobs, The Jacobs Law Firm, Chtd., Chicago, Illinois, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Peter L. Winik and Barry J. Blonien, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, for the defendants-appellees.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
