In an ERISA action arising from a denial of disability benefits, summary judgment for defendants on limitations grounds is affirmed where defendant’s benefit plan’s limitations period was enforceable because the plan was not ambiguous and the limitations period was reasonable.
Read Salisbury v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., No. 08-3316
Appellate Information
Filed September 30, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Hartz
Counsel
For Appellant:
Jack Shelton, Wichita, KS
For Appellee:
Patrick J. Kenney, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
